| « Papervision3D - Preliminary Tests | Finally - New Slimline Nokia Smartphones » |
There used to be a time when everything tech wasn't so "meta", and things (mostly) worked in the way they were designed.
Whilst browsing the web just now using Internet Explorer 7 (normally I use Firefox 2), I get the following request for an ActiveX control to be installed:
This website wants to run the following add-on: 'Microsoft HTML Viewer' from 'Microsoft Corporation'
(Click pic to enlarge)
HTML viewer plug-in... for a Web browser!? Well I guess now we can put both HTML and Flash in the same box as "plug-in" based technologies hey (just kidding)
Is this done on purpose to make IE look bad, or is it just plain insanity? I'm going to give a Mac and OSX a trial within a couple of months (been thinking about this for some time), coming from using Amiga which had a great OS, I prefer to be in more control of what I work on.
I particularly like the contrast of the subject matter displayed in the browser.
10 comments
Comments are closed for this post.

Follow me on Twitter
I'm not sure why you'd see that alert on that page, however. I visited that same page in FF1.5x/WinXP and it couldn't play the video, said it required a QT component which wasn't available from the QuickTime servers. Maybe it's the error messages themselves which are in error...?
jd
Said I didn't have Quicktime. Download and run; "Already have latest version installed, can't continue installer." Huh?
Run IE7 again. I remember that sometimes you can click the yellow bar up top to "make things run". Did so. Page refreshes.
Alert again... this time, though, it says Quicktime, not the HTML viewer. That time it ran.
...bloody...hell... IE blows.
Matt, so good to hear from you it's been years! I think it's a done deal really, I just need to make sure I have all bases covered. If Vista runs with hardware support through a future version of bootcamp, parallels, coherence et al I have even less to worry about. Well it's that or switch to using an Atari ST...winner.
I swear if you don't switch to a mac I will come round and beat you death with my ibook! But in all seriousness whilist working with Flash, Dreamweaver, etc at University we always used macs. I found them to be stable, easy to use, damn quick and...I don't know Dreamweaver certainly seemed to feel a better product on the Mac compared to the clunky feeling PC version I know use. It may just be Mac tinted glasses but I'd like to recommend that you go for it buddy.
http://eokyere.blogspot.com/2006/10/mbp-club.html
Processor: 4.8
Memory: 4.9
Graphics: 4.1
Gaming graphics: 4.5
Primary Disk: 4.9
Jon Harris
Microsoft UXe